INFORMATION OPERATIONS
ACSC Research Topic
March 2005
Compiled by Glenda Armstrong
Bibliographer, Air University Library
Maxwell AFB, AL
For more information, see AUL bibliography Information Operations compiled by Stephen B. T. Chun September 2003.
The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Air Force of this web site or the information, products, or services contained therein. For other than authorized activities such as military exchanges and morale, welfare and recreation sites, the U.S. Air Force does not exercise any editorial control over the information you may find at these locations. Such links are provided consistent with the stated purpose of this DoD web site.
Some materials listed below require access to subscription databases. If you cannot gain access, contact your local library for availability. AU students and faculty can contact AUL's Web Maintainer for a password
All sites listed were last accessed on March 23, 2005.
Air War College Gateway to the Internet - Information Operations.
Available online:
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-info.htm
Airmen Add 'Information Armor' to Iraq Convoys. FDCH
Regulatory Intelligence Database December 10, 2004.
Available online:
http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mth&an=32W0629113744
Barnett, Roger W. Information Operations, Deterrence and the Use of
Force. Terrorism Research Center.
Available online:
http://www.terrorism.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=9&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
Federation of American Scientists. Intelligence Operations.
Available online:
http://www.fas.org/irp/ops/
Federation of American Scientists.
Operations Security Intelligence Threat Handbook.
Available online:
http://www.fas.org/irp/nsa/ioss/threat96/part01.htm
Field Manual 100-6 Information Operations. U.S. Department of the
Army. 27 August 1996.
Available online:
http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm100-6/
Hubbard, Zachary P. IO in the Information Age. Journal of
Electronic Defense 27:49-53 May 2004.
Discusses information operations (IO) in the U.S.
Air Force. Deployment of numerous systems with tremendous IO and IO-related
capabilities; Publishing of a doctrine document regarding IO; High degree of
situational awareness needed by a successful IO.
Available online:
http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=13139038
Institute for the Advanced Study of Information Warfare. March 12, 2003.
Available online at: http://www.psycom.net/iwar.1.html
"The purpose of the IASIW is to facilitate an understanding of information warfare with reference to both military and civilian life."
Provides links to over 900 sites and publications.
Joint Doctrine for Information Operations. Joint Pub 3-13.
9 October 1998.
Available online:
http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new_pubs/jp3_13.pdf
Puttre, Michael. Losing Friends and IO. Journal of
Electronic Defense 27:10 April 2004.
Discusses the importance of information operations
in avoiding fratricide of the so-called collateral damage. Impact of perception
management on the nature of military operations of U.S. forces; Importance of
the combination of psychological operations and public affairs in influencing
the permissiveness of military environment.
Available online:
http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=12802588
United States. Air Force. Information Operations. August 5, 1998. (Air Force
Doctrine Document 2-5).
Available online at: http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/service_pubs/afd2_5.pdf
Alberts, Davis S. Information Age Transformation:
Getting to a 21st Century Military. Washington, CCRP Publication
Series, 2003. 145 p.
Book call no.: 355.6880973 A334i
Berkowitz, Bruce D. The New Face of War:
How War Will be Fought in the 21st Century. New York, Free Press,
2003. 257 p.
"As Western forces wage war against terrorists and their supporters, in actions
large and small, on several continents, The New Face of War explains how they
fight and how they will win or lose. There are four key dynamics to the new
warfare: asymmetric threats, in which even the strongest armies may suffer from
at least one Achilles' heel; information-technology competition, in which
advantages in computers and communications are crucial; the race of decision
cycles, in which the first opponent to process and react to information
effectively is almost certain to win; and network organization, in which fluid
arrays of combat forces can spontaneously organize in multiple ways to fight any
given opponent at any time." "Bruce Berkowitz offers many answers and a
framework for understanding combat that will never again resemble the days of
massive marches on fortress-like positions."
Book call no.: 355.02 B513n
Information Operations: Warfare and the Hard
Reality of Soft Power edited by Leigh Armistead. Washington, Brassey's,
2004. 277 p.
Book call no.: 355.3430973 I43
National Security in the Information Age edited by Emily O. Goldman.
Portland, OR, Frank Cass, 2004. 238 p.
Book call no.: 355.033073 N2776
Perry, Walt L. et al.
Exploring Information Superiority: A Methodology for Measuring the
Quality of Information and Its Impact on Shared Awareness.
Santa Monica, CA, RAND, 2004. 141 p. Some of the documents cited in this section are
student papers written to fulfill PME school requirements Bailey, Alvin L. The Implications of Network
Centric Warfare. Carlisle Barracks, PA, U.S. Army War College, 2004.
19 p.
Also available online:
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0410/2003022433.html
Book call no.: 355.33041 P465e
"This paper will examine Network Centric Warfare the centerpiece of
Transformation. This form of warfare depends heavily on computer networks, the
Internet communications, and sensors. These areas of dependence also provide
numerous vulnerabilities. This paper will focus specifically on Network Centric
Warfare's vulnerabilities in terms of sensors, cyberterrorism/Electro-Magnetic
Pulse (EMP) and bandwidth/ frequency. The assessment of the areas listed above
and the other strategic implications will lead to a conclusion as to its
efficacy of Network Centric Warfare as the centerpiece of
Transformation."--Abstract taken from web site.
Also available online:
Doc. call no.: M-U 39080-537 B154i
Breazile, Gregory T. Defensive Information
Operations in Support of the Marine Air Ground task Force. Fort
Leavenworth, KS, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, 2002. 102 p.
"Currently the Marine Corps has no doctrine for information operations (IO).
The Marine Corps Doctrine Division has published an IO concept paper from which
to guide the development of IO doctrine. In joint and other service doctrine, IO
is defined in both as an offensive and defensive capability. This thesis only
discusses defensive IO (DIO) and will attempt to provide the reader with insight
into how the MAGTF could conduct DIO. A USMC concept paper on IO, joint IO
doctrine, and sister service IO doctrine were used to provide an understanding
of how IO and DIO are defined by each. Additionally, analysis of the DIO threat
and an overview of current MAGTF capabilities to conduct each of element of DIO
(information assurance, physical security, operational security,
counterintelligence, counterpropaganda, counterdeception, and electronic
warfare) is provided. The thesis also analyzes historical examples of each DIO
element to demonstrate relevance of each to MAGTF operations. Conclusions and
recommendations are provided for each DIO element. This thesis demonstrates the
need for DIO in support of the MAGTF and how the MAGTF should incorporate DIO
into their service IO doctrine."--Abstract taken from web site.
Also available online:
http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA406491
Doc. call no.: M-U 42022 B8281d
Burton, Gerald V. Principles of Information
Operations: A recommended Addition to U.S. Army Doctrine, a Monograph.
Fort Leavenworth, KS, School of Advanced Military Studies, Army Command
General Staff College, 2003. 62 p.
"It is imperative that Army doctrine fulfill its mandate to create common
understanding across the force. This includes establishing a common basis for
conducting IO across the spectrum of conflict. Army IO doctrine must provide
commanders and their staffs the foundation necessary to effectively integrate IO
into full spectrum operations. Without successful IO, achieving information
superiority is unlikely. Without information superiority, the Army is at risk of
failing to accomplish its assigned missions in the decisive manner that is
expected and necessary. The soon to be released FM 3-13, Information Operations:
Doctrine, Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures, represents a leap ahead in Army
thinking about IO. It is particularly good at describing the IO threat and how
the IO elements and related activities interact.
It also presents numerous and detailed tactics, techniques and procedures for
conducting (planning, preparing, executing and assessing IO). Still, this
monograph asserts that FM 3-13 lacks a general, macro-level articulation of how
IO elements are combined, so it needs to add a set of principles that guide
commanders and staffs on how to combine the IO elements. This monograph seeks to
discover whether or not existing U.S., Russian, and Chinese doctrine and theory
can provide the sought after guidance on combining IO elements. The answer is
yes. An analysis of all three nations writings on IO, and synthesis of the
related ideas, shows they do offer potential solutions to the problem. These
solutions are offered as recommended improvements to the ongoing Army IO
doctrine debate. The monograph subscribes to the idea that IO is an integrating
strategy, relating means to ends. Combining the elements is the essential part
of this strategy, and must be guided by six principles."--Abstract from web
site.
Also available online:
http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA415801
Doc. call no.: M-U 42022-2 B9743p
Erb, Stephen S. Network Centric Warfare:
An Operational Perspective. Newport, RI, Naval War College, 2004.
31 p.
"Network Centric Warfare development is currently proceeding from the tactical
level up, with little concern to the overarching requirements of the operational
level of war. The implied assumption is that the concepts, both technical and
organizational, will naturally scale to the operational and strategic levels.
Absent an operational perspective, what is likely to develop is a large-scale
tactical tool set and an operational staff structure that evolves to support
this tactical tool set. This paper examines Network Centric Warfare from the
Operational Commander's perspective by first examining the Operational
Commander's requirements of a command and control system, comparing those
requirements to what Network Centric Warfare as currently envisioned will
provide, then recommends an operational staff organization to support the
requirements of the Operational Commander in a Network Centric Warfare
environment. The recommended staff structure is designed to provide the
Operational Commander the flexibility to benefit from self-synchronized forces
as well as to take close control of forces when required by the mission.
"--Abstract taken from web site.
Also available online: http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA422795
Doc. call no.: M-U 41662 E65n
Manning, Steve. Improved Intelligence Support to
Our Coalition Partners at the Operational Level. Newport, RI, Naval
War college, 2004. 18 p.
"Intelligence support in a coalition environment is broken. Using a case study
method of intelligence support during the Vietnam War, Bosnia intervention and
most recently during OIF the theme that US operational intelligence support to
our coalition partners is not adequate is explained through a lack of: proper
doctrine, SOPs and memorandums, lack of production of intelligence products at a
releasable level, and non existent communications architecture to our coalition
partners."--Abstract taken from web site.
Also available online:
http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA425932
Doc. call no.: 41662 M2841i
Martin, William J. Information Pervades All
Levels of War: A Study of Information Operations in Iraq.
Maxwell AFB, AL, Air command and Staff College, 2003. 28 leaves.
Doc. call no.: M-U 43122 M3832i
Moorman, John R. The Future Role of Information
Operations in Operational Art. Newport, RI, Naval War College, 2003.
17 p.
"This paper looks at the relationship between the rate of technology
development and the role of information operations in the operational art.
Computer processing power has doubled every two years since 1959 in accordance
with Moore's Law, bringing with it a corresponding decrease in cost. Networking
computers has exponentially increased the power of individual computers in
accordance with Moore's Law. These technological phenomenon have produced the
information age, where the ability to gather, process and exchange information
is the source of power and wealth. The military is adapting to the information
age, incorporating information systems in its infrastructure and exploring new
warfighting concepts such as network centric warfare, that leverage the power of
networks. The increasing integration of technology into weapons systems and
operational concepts will increase the operational commanders capabilities and
vulnerabilities. Without a corresponding increase in information operations
capabilities and strategies, the best strategy can be defeated by successful
destruction of information systems. Future operational commanders must
understand the effects of increasing technological development and integration,
and the increasing role and significance of information operations that
corresponds with it."--Abstract taken from web site.
Also available online:
http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA405639
Doc. call no.: M-U 41662 M825f
Porter, Carl D. Network Centric Warfare:
Transforming the U.S. Army. Carlisle Barracks, PA, 2004. 32 p.
"The old paradigms of U.S. military operations in the industrial age are dead.
Military relevance in the information dominated 21st Century no longer comes
from the industrial age concept of massing forces or attrition warfare. Rather,
it comes from a new information age paradigm where access to information enables
the rapid employment of the right force at the right place and time to achieve
strategic objectives, while preventing any adversary from doing the same. To
achieve this position of dominance, the Department of Defense has embraced the
concepts of Network Centric Warfare (NCW) as a way to transform the force and
achieve Joint Vision 2020 objectives. This information age concept provides a
systems view of the battle space that can radically compress the strategic,
operational, and tactical levels of war and dramatically increase combat power
through shared awareness and self-synchronization. The concept will not take
hold in the U.S. Army, however, without a substantial effort to overcome
impediments and a corresponding co-evolution of processes, organizations and
technology infrastructure. This research paper provides a summary of network
centric warfare concepts and highlights some of the challenges to applying it
throughout a transformed Army force."--Abstract taken from web site.
Also available online:
http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA423794
Doc. call no.: M-U 39080-537 P844n
Seward, Andrew B. U.S. Strategic Information
Operations: The Requirement for a Common Definition and Organizational
Structure in Support of the Global War on Terrorism. Carlisle
Barracks, PA, U.S. Army War college, 2004. 28 p.
" Despite its lofty title as one of the national elements of power, the
informational component is fundamentally misunderstood in concept, diffused in
responsibility, and fragmented in application. In American society, the right to
free speech has primacy and citizens have a healthy distrust of official
government rhetoric. Thus, the second tier status of informational power is
perhaps unsurprising. But in the war of ideas and ideals that is the current
Global War on Terrorism (GWOT), strategic information operations can be neither
ignored nor allowed to languish. It is time to re-organize and focus information
operations at a national strategic level and harness its potential. Kinetic
military power, diplomacy, and America's economic might are critical to the GWOT,
but similar success in strategic information operations is essential to creating
lasting change. This paper reviews the current state of strategic information
operations; discusses the lack of existing consensus regarding strategic
information operations' definition, scope, and what it might accomplish;
suggests a new model for strategic-level information operations; and compares
and makes a recommendation from four options for better organizing information
operations within the United States Government at the national strategic level
in support of GWOT."--Abstract taken from web site.
Also available online:
http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA424404
Doc. call no.: M-U 39080-537 S514u
Westermeyer, Richard H. Computer Network
Operations: The Final Frontier for Intelligence. Carlisle
Barracks, PA, U.S. Army War College, 2003. 23 p.
Doc. call no.: M-U 39080-537 W527c
Campen, Alan D. Information Operations May Find Definition and Validation in Iraq. Signal 57:43-45 June 2003.
Campen, Alan D. Information Operations Seeks Blend of Missives and Missiles. Signal 56:33-35 June 2002.
Campen, Alan D. Intelligence is the Long Pole in the Information Operations Tent. Signal 54:35-36 March 2000.
David, John. Leading
the Information War. Marine Corps Gazette 89:24-26 February
2005.
Reports that the U.S. Marine Corps consistently
demonstrates leadership in innovative thinking in terms of warfare concepts.
Effort on dealing with terrorism and small wars; Strategies in planning and
control of operations; Implementation of functional information operations in
order to win the information battles.
Emery, Norman et al. Fighting Terrorism and Insurgency: Shaping
the Information Environment. Military Review 85:32-39
January-February 2005.
Focuses on the development of information systems for the fight against
terrorism and insurgency in the U.S. Limitation of joint information operations
(IO) doctrine; Security environment in the country after the September 11, 2001
terrorist attack; Overview of "Joint Vision 2010," a document providing
direction of overall IO strategy.
Also available online:
http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=16241308
Emery Norman. Information Operations in Iraq. Military
Review 84:11-15 May-June 2004.
Focuses on the information operations of the U.S.
Army in Iraq. Factors that affects the ability of the U.S. Army to win the
counter-insurgency battle; Description of information operations; Information
advantages of guerillas.
Also available online:
http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=13615852
Guenther, Eric and Schreckengost, Gary. Converting the IO (Information Operations) Concept into Reality. Armor 112:18-20+ July-August 2003.
Guevin, Paul R. Information Operations. Air & Space Power
Journal 18:122 Summer 2004.
Information Operations (IO) doctrine has evolved
from age-old concepts of influencing and shaping battles through deception and
control of information to more recent methods based on advanced communications
and electronic warfare (EW). Air Force Doctrine Document (AFDD) 1, Air Force
Basic Doctrine, 17 November 2003, defines IO as the integrated employment of
three operational elements— EW operations, network-warfare operations, and
influence operations— to affect or defend decision makers and their
decision-making process.
Also available online:
http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=13263244
Kenyon, Henry S. Unconventional Information Operations Shorten Wars. Signal 57:33-36 August 2003.
Lamb,
Christopher J. Information Operations as a Core Competency.
JFQ: Joint Force Quarterly 36:88-97 Winter 2005.
The article focuses on the importance of information
gathering for decision making in military success. The article states that the
Department of Defense (DOD) must align itself with the information revolution
not just by exploiting information technology, but also by developing
information enabled organizational relationships and operating concepts. The
2001 Quadrennial Defense Review identified information operations as one of six
operational goals for DOD transformation. The central objective of the roadmap
is to accelerate the transition of information operations (IO) a core military
competency by providing a way ahead on all of these requisite activity areas.
Also available online:
http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=15946552
McNeive, James F. Information Operations at the Tactical Level.
Marine Corps Gazette 87:52-53 June 2003.
Focuses on the application of information operations
in various roles at the tactical level of warfare of the U.S. military forces.
Concept of operations; Deal of theory and policy of the military; Role of
commanders in an operation; Limitation of resources for the Navy and Air Force.
Maiers, Mark W. and Rahn, Timothy L.
Information Operations and Millennium Challenge. JFQ: Joint
Force Quarterly 35:83-88 Autumn 2004.
This article focuses on Millennium Challenge, a joint exercise hosted by U.S.
Joint Forces Command in summer 2002. One goal was to develop recommendations on
doctrine, organization, training, manpower, logistics, personnel, and
facilities. From the outset of the exercise it was apparent that information
operations could produce decisive effects in the fight. These efforts integrate
military deception, psychological operations, electronic warfare, operational
security, and computer network operations.
Also available online:
http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=15248335
Nunn, Matthew J. ASAS (All-Source Analysis System) Master Analysts' Support to Information Operations -- Analysis. Military Intelligence 30:78 January-March 2004.
Wright, Richard H. Information Operations:
Doctrine, Tactics, Techniques and Procedures. Military Review
81:30-32 March-April 2001.
Focuses on military information operations. Significance of the United States
Army Field Manual 3-13; Comparison between the 1996 and 2000 army field manuals;
Difference between the army and joint information operations doctrine.
Also available online:
http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&an=4400408