RETURN TO Battlelabs list
Battlelab success stories
Articles in this series written by:
Michael Jackowski and Tech. Sgt. Jeffrey Phillips--IWB;
Capt. Erick Jordan--AEFB;
Capt. Scott Stevens, Capt. Brett Conner and Maj. Dave Mulligan--SB;
Lt. Col. Mark Surina--AMB;
Capt. Mary Bartholomew and Tony Muccio--UAVB

Since its founding on March 17, 1997, the Information
Warfare Battlelab has completed more than 33 concept demonstrations. Currently,
there are 10 more in the process of being demonstrated and 41 more in the
pipeline.
Leaflet bombs: One example of IWB’s “cool stuff” is an initiative
called Leaflet Bomb, an idea that came from a master sergeant in Air
Intelligence Agency’s psychological operations division.
The concept was to use demilitarized munition canisters as a robust supplement
to the current fiberglass psychological leaflet dispenser. IWB found a suitable
obsolete munition canister, the Rockeye, that could be modified to drop leaflets
from high-performance aircraft such as the F-16. Now called the PDU-5/B, these
canisters can deliver about 60,000 leaflets at a cost of less than $500 per
unit. The project went from demonstration to the field in about nine months
allowing Leaflet Bomb to be used in both Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi
Freedom. In fact, in Iraqi Freedom, PDU-5/Bs deployed before the first iron
started hitting targets in Baghdad.
Few would have imagined the IWB efforts would be so
influential in contributing to Air Force combat operations. But as Capt. Steve
Burke, winner of the USAF General Billy Mitchell Battlelab Project Officer of
the Year for 2002, said: “it’s all in a day’s work.” The Leaflet Bomb was a
little unusual for IWB in that the initiative came from an internal USAF source.
Uniquely among the Air Force battlelabs, almost 75 percent of the 400-plus
concepts IWB has evaluated have come from external sources: industry and
academia.
Radio Threads: One such project with potential for use in on-going
operations is an initiative called Radio Threads. This concept is a small,
inexpensive, low-powered radio transmitter that can be air-dropped, remotely
activated, remotely controlled, and used in a variety of roles to include
blocking selective frequencies or entire radio bands. Sister service
representatives from the Marine Corps have picked up the project. The Corps is
allocating resources to further develop the initiative into a tool that Marine
forces can use on the ground. Radio Threads is just one example among many of
the inherently joint nature of this battlelab’s projects. Unlike other
acquisition processes, IWB’s is not requirements-driven. This means the
battlelab’s goal is to make sure it stays in touch with major commands and their
documented needs, but doesn’t always mandate an established need or requirement
before proceeding with a concept demonstration. An excellent example of how and
why this works is a concept called Telecom-munications Firewall or TeleWall.
TeleWall: Telewall was a revolutionary technology
that ported a standard data network firewall onto telephone lines to protect
telecommunications networks, e.g., back-door modems. However, at the time there
was no established requirement for firewalls for telephones. The vendor brought
in a prototype system and in just 57 days, the battlelab arranged a
demonstration at three Air Force Space Command bases. The demonstration was so
successful at implementing real-time operations security that Space Command
purchased all the demo units on the spot and kept them in-place. In the words of
IWB’s commander, Col. Nate Titus: “that’s the ultimate compliment, when they
want us to leave food on the table.”
Today, the Air Force is actively acquiring and installing Telecom-munications
Firewall systems at all 140 Air Force bases, Air National Guard bases and AF
Reserve bases worldwide where it has only just begun to play an active role in
the war on terror by protecting Air Force networks.
Ciphony: An initiative which extends the Telecommunications Firewall is
Ciphony. This concept automates operations security by Triple-DES encrypting
unclassified telephone calls without the users’ needing special phones, keys or
other encryption gear. Although this is not the same type of encryption used by
STU-III telephones, this 128-bit encryption is a level of protection that the
bad guys will find hard to break. A simple hardware and software addition to the
already existing Telecommunications Firewall boxes makes all this happen.
Ciphony is crucial to protecting unclassified essential elements of critical
information and command and control operations. Implementation of Ciphony is
another success story in the making with both AFCA and IWB working to transition
it into the operational Air Force.
Charged coupled device: Visible Missile Warning System uses a charged
coupled device camera—the same type that powers your home camcorders— to rapidly
detect surface-to-air missile launches. Results against “smoky SAMs”—dummy
rockets that model SAM plumes—showed faster detection time over typical infrared
detectors with significantly lower false alarm rates. This initiative performed
so well against the “smoky SAMs” that it is now scheduled to fly against the
real thing.
Instant DataProtect: Software crashes are the cause of most such
system outages, and to be able to restore a crashed workstation in seconds vs.
hours or days means a lot to operational users.
In February, AEFB successfully demonstrated the IDP initiative on a live network
at RAF Mildenhall, United Kingdom, which showed the military utility of the
quick restoration times IDP provides from system corruptions in an operational
environment. Corruptions defeated in the demonstration were viruses, registry
corruption, and format as well as other attacks. Instant Data Protect uses a
software algorithm quickly and efficiently to restore a computer hard disk. This
allows immediate recovery from viruses, Trojan horses and stupid user antics.
Where it used to take two to three days to rebuild an Exchange server, IDP can
bring it back to full operations in less than 15 seconds.
The program runs on individual workstations or on servers using non-redundant
array of independent disks hard disk configurations. The program runs in the
background and provides protection by filtering all write commands to the hard
drive.
IDP takes a snapshot of the hard drive's data and
configuration and can store up to 10 such snapshots. Each snapshot is a complete
binary inventory of the hard-drive contents and occupies less than .01 percent
of total hard drive space. Even with a full complement of 10 snapshots, this
only takes up .1 percent of the drive. By comparison, most of the currently
existing solutions require at least half a hard drive-50 percent or more for
similar type of recovery systems. Viruses that attempt to attack the hard drive
neither hinder IDP nor cause damage to the PC. Because IDP's protection protocol
begins prior to the operating system’s boot-up process, a virus cannot damage
the snapshots since it doesn't know they exist. Simple recovery to a snapshot
before the infection occurred completely removes the virus from the machine. For
Trojan horses, IDP has unique recovery functionality. It boots up on a previous
snapshot and mounts the crashed session to recover all data from before the
malicious code infected the drive.
“In addition to IDP’s ability to protect our vital
information resources, it would provide huge benefits in the AF’s education and
training environments,” said Capt. Garald Egts, instructional technologies
project manager from HQ AETC's Technology Branch. “Instruct-ors will be able to
establish and easily transition between pre-configured training environments and
scenarios on classroom computers. For example, workgroup manager courses could
create different checkpoints with existing problems, such as the printer drivers
not installed correctly, for students to troubleshoot. As it takes only seconds
to restore a system, this will provide instructors with flexibility not
currently available. It also better reinforces students’ training with more
diverse, hands-on scenarios in less total time.”
Reachback: Reachback was IWB’s first demonstration. This initiative
provided classified satellite communications to deployed intelligence and combat
units. The project was so successful during an Air Force Green Flag exercise, it
became the blueprint for all the other information reachback capabilities used
on joint systems and special operations combat platforms. Reachback has already
transitioned to Air Force and sister services combat systems.

During the course of its six-year history, the AEFB has
evaluated more than 336 ideas from industry and field sources. Out of these, 23
have been completed and briefed to the Air Force Requirements for Operational
Capabilities Council. Fifteen initiatives are currently in advanced development
and many concepts are being assessed and developed for possible initiatives.
Past AEF Battlelab initiatives include:
Enhanced Maintenance Operations Capabilities: EMOC demonstrated the
ability to replace existing homegrown software tools with a command-wide
visualization tool that can be used in tracking daily aircraft maintenance and
sortie operations of a flying unit at home or while deployed.
Wireless Immediate Communications for Entire Base: WICEB
demonstrated the ability to provide rapid communications for customers located
within tents or buildings by using a radio frequency and infrared wireless local
area network and provided Voice over Internet Protocol.
AEF Data Compression: AEF Data Compression proved the feasibility
of using commercial off-the-shelf equipment and software to compress standard
office application files, audio, video and imagery data for multiple
applications within the AEF.
In addition to the above communications and software related initiatives, the
AEF Battlelab has brought numerous advancements to the warfighter outside of the
realm of communications. Some current initiatives from the aerospace ground
equipment and medical functional areas include:
Mobile Aircraft Jacks and Equipment Kit: The Mobile Aircraft Jacks and
Equipment Kit addresses the standardization issue of aircraft jacks. It will
provide an easily deployable, universal jack for the majority of AEF heavy
aircraft. It will replace the current jacking system that includes a diesel
driven pumping unit and hydraulically operated jacks. MAJEK will also supply a
deployable load tester that is currently not available.
Hemostatic Agent for Life Saving: The AEFB and the Force Protection
Battlelab have partnered to assess a hemostatic agent to control hemorrhage of
AEF personnel deployed in wartime and peacetime contingencies. The HEAL
initiative is innovative in that it works significantly faster, requires no
mixing, is stable at room temperature, is available in multiple formulations and
is packaged in a manner that allows the injured individual to self-administer if
necessary.

Master Air Attack Planning Toolkit: A
recently completed initiative, the Master Air Attack Planning Toolkit
initiative, illustrates the C2B process. Following approval, the C2B brought in
a group of MAAP subject matter experts from the Air Force Numbered Air Forces,
the Navy and the Marines to participate in a Warfighter Analysis Workshop to lay
out the look, feel and functionality for the MAAP TK initiative. Then June 26,
2001, the contract for development was signed. During the next 14 months,
several more meetings with warfighter subject matter experts were hosted to
review progress and insure the correct vector for the MAAP TK. A warfighter
assessment of the finished product was conducted as part of Joint Forces
Experiment 02 in August 2002, where the MAAP TK was rated a "home run" by the
warfighter, operators and assessors.
Following a report to Air Force leadership, the C2B worked to acquire funding
for transition of the MAAP TK into the joint air operations planning system of
record, Theater Battle Management Core Systems. MAAP TK will be integrated into
TBMCS version 1.1.3. At the same time, at the request of the warfighters in the
Combined Air Operations Centers in Saudi Arabia and Korea and at the direction
of Air Force leadership, the C2B provided mobile training teams to install and
train the MAAP TK at Prince Sultan Air Base, Saudi Arabia, and the Hardened
Tactical Air Control Center in Korea. The MAAP TK was used in planning of the
air war in Iraq for Operation Iraqi Freedom.
B-52 Close Air Support: The B-52 Close Air Support Enhancement
initiative will demonstrate transmitting a digital 9-line Close Air Support
message from Tactical Air Control Party Moderni-zation equipment to a B-52. This
capability will improve Air Force support to CAS operations. The Army Air Force
Data Exchange System initiative will demonstrate that automating data exchange,
at the database level, between Army Battle Command System and Theater Battle
Management Core Systems systems in the Joint Air Operations Center will
significantly improve situational awareness for JAOC decision makers.
Visualization of Expeditionary Sites Tool: The Visualization of
Expeditionary Sites Tool will provide a capability that provides rapid, explicit
presentation of all critical support data; weighting of operational and support
parameters; and production of a list (with pictures, limiting factors and
alternatives) for planners to evaluate and select the "best" location for basing
of forces in support of expeditionary operations. VEST will give logistics
planners the capability to make timely, informed site selections.

Stingray: A recently completed initiative provides
Predator with the capability to locate, track and identify mobile targets of
interest. The goal was to enhance Predators’ operational capability by using the
Tactical Endurance Synthetic Aperture Radar in Moving Target Indicator mode.
This initiative, nicknamed Stingray for the maritime MTI applications, was
successfully completed. The overall results of the demonstration clearly
indicated that the capability to detect, track and identify mobile targets using
the MTI mode of the TESAR enhanced Predators’ operational capability.
DIVOT: Another ongoing initiative is Digital Imagery Video-compression
and Object Tracking that substantially decreases communication requirements for
disseminating UAV products, decreases storage requirements for production and
exploitation facilities and reduces the image analyst workload. DIVOT shows
significant promise in helping meet the functional needs of the warfighter in
the areas of situational awareness, targeting, collection management, battle
damage assessment and order of battle maintenance.
The UAVB integrates the compression algorithm directly on the
Predator airframe where video will is compressed directly from the sensors. The
compressed video is then fed to the Predators’ communication suite where it will
be transmitted via the Ku-band satellite, C-band air-to-air, and C-band
air-to-ground links. In addition to the data compression, the initiative will
demonstrate an object identification capability that can cue operators to the
detection of both man and machine objects based on visual signatures.
Once analyzed, the video will be further compressed and
stored on databases for future retrieval and follow-on dissemination. During an
initial phase of this initiative, the UAVB conducted a military utility
assessment at the Eglin range. The Air Force Communication Agency assisted the
UAVB in the assessment, and provided an independent validation and verification
process for the results. Outside interest is growing for DIVOT as the Office of
Naval Research has expressed interest in using DIVOT to compress all
ship-to-shore communications. In addition, the UAVB and NIMA are discussing the
potential of integrating it into the MPEG-2 transport stream and thereby become
the industry standard.

Carrier Interferometry: Carrier
Interferometry was originally developed for cellular communication and wireless
networking applications. The technology applies specific principles of quantum
mechanics, employing interferometric components of wave theory. CI is based on
combining Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplex with phase shifting. With CI
the Air Force hopes to achieve improvements in throughput and increase the
number of users employing existing frequency bands.
CI is a technological approach that couples frequency and phase shifting to
decompose a signal into components to provide significant performance
enhancements over conventional transmission protocols. Potential CI improvements
to conventional protocols include sharing or trade-offs among data-rates,
power-outputs, bit-error rates, number of users and transmission times required
to pass data.
Also, CI techniques reduce both noise and multipath
interference degradation found in traditional radios and protocols. In general,
the more severe the environment, the greater the benefits produced by CI when
compared to traditional waveforms. Even in an ideal environment with low noise
and multipath interference, CI should provide a three to four decibel gain.
Significantly lower power is needed for CI transmissions to achieve the same
bit-error rates and signal-to-noise ratios as traditional modulation formats.
Because of lower current drain, it is possible to extend battery life, lighten
operator physical loads and use smaller or fewer batteries.
CI enables frequency-based combining of received signals,
which enables a more efficient processing of the received energy, thus,
significantly improving performance. Performance improvements can be used to
provide any combination of increased range, reduced transmission power, improved
interference mitigation and increased data throughput.
Lite Catcher: Doing what some call impossible is the task of the Air
Force’s seven battlelabs, and one such seemingly impossible task is the Lite
Catcher initiative, that will demonstrate a free space optical link through
clouds. Free space optical networks are communications networks that use lasers
instead of radio frequencies to carry information.
Lasers can transmit hundreds even thousands of times more
information than radio frequencies. Removing bandwidth as a restriction is
critical to transforming military communications. Warfighters would no longer
have to wait hours for critical yet bandwidth-intensive data, such as videos
from unmanned aerial vehicles or high-resolution imagery.
However, there are drawbacks to laser communications and free
space optical networks. Atmospheric turbulence can distort the laser beam,
causing data to be lost. Scientists have spent years developing technologies
such as adaptive optics in an attempt to overcome atmospheric distortion.
However, one problem remains: weather. Light particles, called photons, are
still susceptible to scattering off of water droplets, smoke or sand. As
Operational Iraqi Freedom demonstrated, warfighters still have to fight in the
presence of sandstorms and rain clouds. It’s for this reason that the Space
Battlelab is examining new technologies such as pulsed lasers to penetrate
obscurants and maintain high data rates.
The Space Battlelab is familiar to weather penetration
technologies.
For example, the battlelab’s Combat Eye demonstration in the fall of 2002 used
solid-state pulsed lasers to penetrate clouds, smoke and even camouflage to give
a 3-D image of a target.
This highly successful demonstration included ground-to-ground imaging at Yuma
Proving Grounds and airborne imaging from a C-130. For the Combat Eye
demonstration, the Space Battlelab partnered with Air Force Research Laboratory
and Air Force TENCAP, or Tactical Exploitation of National Capabilities.
Extending the technology from the Combat Eye demonstration to
the Lite Catcher communications demonstration is the logical next step. The
Battlelab, AFRL and AF TENCAP partnership will also continue. The weather
resistant Lite Catcher system as demonstrated will have a data rate of one
gigabyte per second and ranges in excess of 25 km, although operational variants
will likely have a magnitude increase in data rate and range.
Phased Array Antenna: SB has teamed with AFSC,
the Space and Missile Systems Center, Air Force Research Laboratory and the 50th
Space Wing to demonstrate the military utility of a phased array antenna for
telemetry, tracking and commanding within the Air Force Satellite Control
Network. NASA has also agreed to support the demonstration to show the
capability to support a future Integrated Satellite Control Network. The AFSPC
Review Board approved the initiative and it’s on schedule for a Spring 2004
demonstration.
This is a shift in which electronically steered phased array
antennas could replace the mechanically steered dish antennas. Military,
government and commercial satellites providing telecommunications,
environmental, navigation and surveillance services in various orbits need high
performance, multi-function antennas with hemispherical coverage. These antennas
perform TT&C to support their payload and spacecraft platform operations. Phased
array antenna technology using electronically steerable arrays are the optimum
choice for this application because they can provide multiple, independently
steered beams with fast beam steering/switching and simultaneous
transmit/receive operation. In addition, they offer high reliability, graceful
degradation, lower maintenance and more automated operation. Phased array
antennas could be employed to cost-effectively support large numbers of
satellites (all altitude) at various stages of operation from launch, orbit
transfer, and early orbit checkout to on-orbit and disposal operations. Phased
array antennas are also candidates to support future concepts of satellite
operation, space based data relay systems and ground/space-based launch ranges
envisioned by the Air Force satellite operations planning community. The current
AFSCN architecture is based on mechanical parabolic reflector antennas which
have limitations including: cable wrap; keyhole effect; frequent and costly
maintenance; long reconfiguration time; manual antenna operation; and high
life-cycle cost. In addition, separate antennas are required for multiple
satellite contacts. Current AFSCN resources are operating at or near saturation.
To date, phased array antennas have not been used for
satellite TT&C operations primarily because of their high acquisition cost in
comparison to technically inferior, but cheaper conventional reflector antennas.
However, with rapidly emerging monolithic micro-integrated circuits, electronic
beam forming, and beam steering technologies as well as low cost commercial
off-the-shelf components from the cell phone industry, large phased array
antennas have become affordable candidates for TT&C in support of Air Force
satellite and launch range operations.

MAIL: One example of Air Mobility Battlelab success in
its partnerships is the recently completed joint project with the Air
Expeditionary Force Battlelab. The Mobility Aircrew Information Library, or MAIL
project, showed how digitized flight publications, flight planning information,
Falcon View maps and live threat feeds could be provided to the aircrew using a
tablet-sized knee board computer and a miniaturized radio receiver. This project
showed how to inexpensively reduce paperwork for the aircrew while providing
easy access to information crucial to worldwide air mobility and fighter
missions. Currently, in partnership with Air Force Research Laboratory at Rome,
N. Y., and AMC, the AMB is maturing a capability to provide AMC flight
dispatchers with rapid access to the many sources of information that may affect
flight planning and execution, such as giving instant updates for Notices to
Airmen, weather and diplomatic clearances.
Iridium satellite phones in flight: One of AMB’s biggest successes
tackled global communications. When U. S. Air Forces in Europe requested an
inexpensive way to equip its aircraft with alternate voice communications, an
AMB project officer designed a way to use iridium satellite phones in flight.
The idea was demonstrated in the field in partnership with the AMC test
community ... and has been implemented on several aircraft.
Chelton antenna mount: Another AMB communications project prototyped a new
mounting system for a Chelton antenna on the C-17 for special operations use.
AMB’s design was adapted by the C-17 contractor and is now in use.
Automatic tracking systems: The Battlelab is also investigating
improvements in managing base armory inventories by linking a contact memory
button on firearms with an automated tracking system that also integrates
personnel identification, qualification, Personnel Reliability Program status
and weapon maintenance.