CAIRO, Egypt, March 13, 2005 Jointness is the way ahead, but that doesnt mean the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps are going to merge into some national joint force, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said here today. |
Air Force Gen. Richard B. Myers spoke to U.S. military personnel at the embassy here and complimented them on forming a good joint-service team. But, he said, he didnt think the individual services should go away.
I think the individual service cultures are extremely important, he said, because, first of all, pride.
He said the pride personnel show in their service is an important part of why they serve. It is also an important part of why we do extraordinary things when asked to do it.
Whatever uniform you wear or what patch you wear on your sleeve has a lot to do with our esprit de corps and our willingness to sacrifice for our friends, our comrades and our nation, Myers said.
The chairman said a second reason why the individual services are important is because they breed healthy competition. Competition is a good thing, he said. The American system is based on it -- in economics, the political world. Competition breeds excellence.
He said the services compete not for resources as they did in the past, but for which service can come up with the best ideas.
Myers said he still thinks there is room for more jointness in the military. That does not mean we should not be a well-integrated fighting machine, he said. I think we are. Weve come a long way since Congress had to legislate that wed be joint back in 1986.
He said the military was pretty pathetic in its ability to work together before the Goldwater-Nichols Act that President Reagan signed that year. Even in Operation Desert Storm, jointness meant deconflicting the battlefield and was not really an integrated effort, Myers said.
But, he added, the military has changed, and anyone studying major combat operations in Iraq, or Operation Enduring Freedom will see that service integration is a way of life.
What is important now is integration beyond the Defense Department, he said. It is especially crucial for the DoD officials to work closely with their compatriots in the State Department.
One thing that can help is the education process, Myers said. By the time a military officer reaches 20 years of service, roughly 10 percent of that officers time in service is spent in an educational institution of some sort. I dont know if that is mirrored in other departments of the government, he said.
Myers said the DoD schools reserve slots for people from other government agencies. All involved see the benefits of that sort of commingling. He said he has appealed to Cabinet members and agency leaders for some sort of cross training. Its usually well-received, he said. Leaders understand that this is important.